1. The Defendants delivered each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

1. The Plaintiff’s judgment on the cause of the claim completed the registration of ownership transfer based on a public sale on the same day with respect to the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter the instant store) on November 27, 2017, and the fact that the Defendants are operating the retail store at the instant store, may be recognized by taking full account of the overall purport of the pleadings, either under dispute between the parties or under the evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (including the serial number).

According to the above facts of recognition, the plaintiff is the owner of the store of this case, and the defendants occupy the above store, so the defendants must deliver the above store to the plaintiff.

2. The Defendants’ assertion as to the Defendants’ assertion is ageless and socially weak, and thus they cannot respond to the Plaintiff’s claim before receiving premium and director’s expense. However, the above assertion alone cannot lead to the source of possessory right to the store of this case. Thus, the above assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.