1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. As to the plaintiff's appeal against the whole judgment of the court before remanding the case after remanding the case, the Gwangju High Court dismissed the appeal against the claim to nullify and revoke the cancellation of the industrial accident compensation insurance-related medical institution disposition as of January 18, 2008, and accepted the plaintiff's appeal against the plaintiff's claim to nullify and revoke the cancellation of the return disposition as of January 16, 2008, and reversed the judgment of the party before remanding the case and remanded the case to the party member. As such, the appeal subject to the judgment after remanding the case is limited to the part that was reversed and remanded, that is, to the part that was reversed and remanded, the claim to nullify and revoke the return disposition as of January 16, 2008, the plaintiff changed the purport of the appeal as of July 23, 2014 "the plaintiff's claim to nullify the return of unjust enrichment of 48,547,360 won and the claim to revoke the return disposition as of January 16, 2014."

2. Basic facts

A. From January 12, 2002, the joint Plaintiff A (hereinafter “A”) established a D-type medical clinic (hereinafter “First Council member”) in the Gunsan-si from around January 12, 2002 and agreed to comply with the Defendant’s “Rules of Medical Institutions”, “Standards for calculating industrial accident compensation insurance”, and “Rules for Medical Treatment” when concluding an industrial accident compensation insurance contract with the Defendant. On February 27, 2002, the Defendant was designated as a medical institution in charge of industrial accident compensation insurance.

B. However, on September 23, 2002, the defendant issued a disposition revoking the designation of a medical institution in charge of industrial accident insurance for the reason that "the above member falsely stated his opinion about the date of the accident, the name of the injury and the state of the injury and disease while treating Nonparty AD," with respect to KRW 1 on September 23, 2002, and against this, A filed a lawsuit against the defendant seeking the cancellation of the previous disposition of this case under the Jeonju District Court 2002Guhap2912, but the above court dismissed A's claim on April 17, 2003, and the above judgment is at that time.