1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The defendant bears the total costs of the lawsuit after the filing of the appeal.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the defendant adds the following judgment as to the new argument that the defendant is at the trial after remand. Thus, the court of first instance cited it as it is in accordance

2. Even if the latter part of Article 55 of the Regulations on the Enforcement of the Personnel Regulations is null and void against Article 19 of the Elderly Employment Act, the plaintiff's retirement age shall be the H 60 years old on the basis of the actual date of birth. However, according to Article 32 of the defendant's personnel regulations and the former part of Article 55 of the Regulations on the Enforcement of the Personnel Regulations, the retirement age of employees shall be 60 years old, and the base date of the retirement age shall be December 31 of the year in which the retirement age reaches the retirement age. Thus, the defendant's above defense is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed on the grounds of its reasoning.