A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 25, 2018, at around 11:58, the Defendant reported 112 that “ABK Enterprise Bank (hereinafter “Defendant) was divinged in the state of home,” and obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the police officer’s 112 reported handling of duties by 112 police officers, considering the circumstances where C and slopeD affiliated with the Busan Coastal Police Station B, which called the Busan Coastal Police Station B, where he was called, and the Defendant’s attempt to have the Defendant returned home.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the parts of damage, pictures and opinions of doctors;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The sentence of imprisonment shall be imposed for a certain period, considering the following: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order and the protection and observation; (b) the suspension of indictment for the injury of a defendant in 2014; (c) the punishment of a fine was imposed in 2015 due to interference with business affairs; (d) it is difficult to find out the situation, such as assaulting a police officer under the influence of alcohol; (d) the police officer immediately received medical treatment; and (e) the police officer does not want the punishment; and (e)