logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.18 2017고단7739
협박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 13, 2017, around 21:00 on October 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victims by booming the shoulder of the victim E two times in a brupt while dividing the fences of the victim D and the victim E into a brupted conversation with a view to accepting the fences of the victim D and the victim E without the consent of the victims; and (b) booming the brupt of the victim D’s flaps by blaging them.

2. The Defendant, at the above date, at the above time and place, will not look back to the victim D and the victim E with the foregoing reason, “h. g. Chewing night path d. h. h. h. h. h. h. h. at the snow.

The tear shall be discarded, such as low-water.

동네에서 인테리어 23년 하고 있으니 밤길 조심해 라. 얼굴 찍어 놨으니 너는 걸리면 가만두지 않겠다.

It is necessary to abandon a hulled rice hushes at night.

The term “intimidating the victims’ life and body, as the victims may cause harm to their life and body.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of D, E, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (a wooden telephone call);

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of intimidation) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Although a person was sentenced to a fine due to a crime of violence committed on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 60(3) of the Juvenile Act, the crime of this case again leads to the crime of this case, the degree of intimidation is not easy, and the victims are deemed to have considerable fears due to intimidation as the defendant and the Dong-dong residents, and the victims and the victims do not reach an agreement, due to the unfavorable circumstances against the defendant, the defendant's mistake is recognized and the victims are committing the crime of death. The defendant accepted the wall of his own sex, and instead, the defendant accepted the wall of his own sex, and instead, in the process of using a mutually visible spambling.

arrow