1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff (formerly: C) is a company aimed at manufacturing, processing, etc. electronic equipment and electronic parts. The Plaintiff (formerly: hereinafter “E”) is a company with the aim of manufacturing, processing, etc. of electronic equipment and electronic parts, and is a sub-subsidiary company as a second-tier company via D Co., Ltd. (D Co., Ltd. and Lt.) located in China, a subsidiary company, as a second-tier company.

2) The Defendant is a company with the aim of manufacturing electrical and electronic parts, etc., and the F Limited Corporation (hereinafter “F”) is a subsidiary company located in China.

B. The Defendant and ELB Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ELB”) are the Defendant and ELB Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ELB”).

(2) On June 26, 2012, the Defendant entered into a basic contract for manufacturing consignment transaction with the content that the Defendant would perform the manufacturing, processing, repair, etc. of the subject matter ordered by ELE under the entrustment and deliver it to ELE. (2) On November 2015, the Defendant received orders for delivery of mobile phone name (G) case (hereinafter “instant product”).

C. E supplied land, development sampling, and sampling among January 2016 to April 2016, 2016, each of the parts of E was supplied to assistive devices used for easy and accurate determination of the knife location by fixing the parts to a certain place when processing the parts of machinery.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 4, 5 (including branch numbers for those with additional numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1, 5, 6, and 16, witness H's testimony, and purport of the whole pleadings

2. The summary of the cause of the claim E and the defendant are in a processing supply transaction relationship with respect to the product of this case, so the defendant bears the obligation to pay land and developed samples E.

In addition, the defendant agreed to pay the land price and development sample price directly to the plaintiff according to the agreement of April 7, 2016 with the plaintiff.

Therefore, the defendant is also the plaintiff.