(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.11.08 2013고단3736

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.11.08 2013고단3736

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등

Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. At around 22:00 on July 29, 2013, the Defendants: (a) under the influence of alcohol in the FVIP room operated by the victim E in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, the Defendants: (b) destroyed, without any justifiable reason, the Defendant Company A opened a singing room container, microphones, 2 entrance-type clothes, etc. on the floor, which is the victim’s possession on the table; and (c) Defendant B destroyed the instant cups, etc. on the floor, shocks, etc.

As a result, the defendants jointly damaged the total amount of 1.2 million won of the market price owned by the victim.

B. The Defendants, at the above time and at the above place, were subject to the removal from the Victim G (22 years of age), the main employee of the victim G, and Defendant A was able to take the victim G’s scam, scam one time, and Defendant B used the victim E (36 years of age) who is the main employee, and the victim H (30 years of age) who is the chief employee, met the Defendant’s assault. Defendant B was able to take the victim’s face and body by drinking the victim’s face and body. Defendant B was able to take scam and bucks, and Defendant A was able to take the victim’s scam with his hand, and Defendant A used the victim’s arms.

As a result, the Defendants assaulted the Victim G jointly with the victim E, and set up a shoulder and sprinkle of the arms that require approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim E, and put the victim H on the right part below that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant B, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving a report on the occurrence of the assault incident at the above time and place, was arrested the Defendant as an offender of the said assault, and was spiting the victim’s face, and was spiting the victim’s face immediately before the patrol spiting.

Ultimately, the defendant is justified in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.09.04 2015고단1051

-의정부지방법원 2018.12.14 2018고단3516

-전주지방법원 2016.06.08 2016고정200

-청주지방법원 2015.12.17 2015고정906

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2013.09.05 2013고단765