1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff asserted that, on July 9, 2012, the Plaintiff was holding a director on the Plaintiff’s ground housing and one parcel of land owned by the Plaintiff, and that the Defendants were 4,500,000 won at the television market price owned by the Plaintiff, equivalent to 1,50,000 won at the kimchi air conditioners market price, equivalent to 50,000 won at the computer market price, equivalent to 1,30,000 won at the computer market price, equivalent to 50,000 won at the computer market price, and 140,70,000,000 won at gas bags market price, and 9,70,000,000, 70,000, 70,000, 70,000, 3,500,000, 300,000,000 won at each of the above market price, and 3,500,000,000.

2. According to the reasoning of the judgment below and evidence No. 1, it is acknowledged that, on August 23, 2013, the Defendants sent to the Plaintiff, a television, a kimchi cooling machine, an electronic opper, a computer, a laundry machine, and an article-certified mail sent out to the Defendants that, on September 20, 2013, the Defendants returned each of the instant corporeal movables owned by the Plaintiff from around September 7, 2012, which were held by the Defendants to the Defendants, to the extent that they were recovered by September 20, 2013, in a sullar, a table, a decoration, a decoration, a lab, and an article-related center, which were kept by the Defendants, and that they returned each of the instant corporeal movables owned by the Plaintiff from around September 7, 2012, as otherwise asserted by the Plaintiff.

There is no evidence to prove that the Defendants refused such a return request from the Plaintiff.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion on a different premise is without merit without further determination.

3. Conclusion.