Defendants shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and C (former trial on the same day) are married couple, and Defendant B and C are children of Defendant A and C.

On April 16, 2016, at around 01:10 on April 16, 2016, the Defendants: “E, while drinking alcohol in the above restaurant, C was arrested as a flagrant offender, at the front of the above restaurant, on the ground that he was at the time of the above restaurant F, who was a customer, the Defendants assaulted C with the above H’s seat and shoulder in his hand, such as a stringing, face and shouldering, etc., and the Defendant “A was sexually fluored by the police, she was fluored by her husband?” The Defendant: “A was fluoring the left-hand rank line on the left-hand side of the above H, she was fluored by the Defendant, who was sexually fluored by the police, and was fluord by the fluor of the above H, and then fluord by the Defendant’s flash by the Defendant’s flash.”

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with C to interfere with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Examination protocol of suspect C:

1. Each statement made to H, I, and F;

1. On-site reports on violent incidents;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damaged police officers;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants who choose to impose punishment: Each selective fine

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;