logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2019.06.26 2019고단127
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and violation of the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident after Accidents) are those engaged in driving a motor vehicle with Bhnburd

On December 30, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car on December 15:50, 2018, and made the turn to the left at an irregular speed of 15-lane in the south-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, in order to turn to the left at the ethic speed, from the ethic side of the city of interest in the city of interest in the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city

On the two-lanes at the time, the victim D(n, 46 years old) driving E is driving, while making a left turn in the same direction as the Defendant’s car, and thus, the driver did not drive under the influence of alcohol, and there was a duty of care to safely drive by checking the right and the right and the right of the driver while observing his two-lanes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and was negligent in driving the damaged vehicle on the left side of the damaged vehicle and received the part above the right part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, around two weeks from the victim D and F (the 17-year old passenger) who is the seatline and tension of the damaged vehicle, etc., each of which requires medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant, after the said damaged vehicle, destroyed the said damaged vehicle to the extent of KRW 617,079, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving a sound driving) driving a vehicle B-hurged with the blood alcohol concentration of about 0.156%, while under the influence of alcohol, from the front of a restaurant to the front of the G in which it is impossible to know the trade name in the name of the master city at a temporary border, such as the above 1.1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Notification of the results of the practical survey, on-site photographs, and the control of drinking driving;

arrow