1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including costs incurred by participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is operating a newspaper distribution center with its head office in Seo-gu, Gwangju.

(Name of Business: C, Management Number: D, hereinafter referred to as “instant workplace”). (b)

(2) The Defendant urged the Plaintiff to pay the total of KRW 83,040,000 industrial accident insurance, 200.8/100 896,832, and the Defendant’s total of KRW 127,050,000 industrial accident insurance, 200, 306,760,000, total of KRW 106,760,000, 245,090, and the total of KRW 2015,00,000, 2014, 2010, 2016, 30,000,000, total of KRW 20,00,000, KRW 10,000,000, KRW 10,654,7801, as stated in the following table, and KRW 20,016, 2016, 204, 2016, 204, 2016, 2016,214,26.

(hereinafter “each of the instant demands”) (hereinafter “each of the instant demands”) is without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings

2. Determination as to the defendant's defense prior to the merits

A. Prior to the merits 1), the Defendant urged the first payment on October 22, 2015 with respect to the employment and industrial accident insurance premiums in 2014 (the disposition taken by the Defendant’s Intervenor on September 21, 2015) and the first demand for the payment on May 21, 2016 with respect to the employment and industrial accident insurance premiums in 2015 (the disposition taken by the Defendant’s Intervenor on June 21, 2016) (the disposition taken by the Defendant’s Intervenor on the imposition of the Defendant’s subsidies is April 20, 2016). Accordingly, each of the instant demands issued on June 21, 2016 are merely a peremptory notice under the Civil Act, demanding the payment of the insurance premium repeatedly with the same content after the first demand is notified.