All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that, with respect to the sentence imposed by the court below (two years of imprisonment, confiscation) on the summary of the reasons for appeal, the defendant is too unfased and the prosecutor is too unfasible and unfair.

2. Following the determination, comprehensively taking into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendant’s disadvantage, the Defendant’s age and family environment, and all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments on changes in the records of the instant case, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too heavy or less appropriate.

[3] The Defendant committed the instant automobile-related crimes in spite of the fact that he was sentenced to a fine twice as a crime related to a motor vehicle (the operation of a motor vehicle with no mandatory insurance and the registration number plate of a motor vehicle). The Defendant committed the instant motor vehicle-related crimes at the same time; the period of operation of the motor vehicle is not shorter; each of the instant theft and intrusion crimes of this case has induced victims holding a high deposit to withdraw the deposit, and has them keep the deposit in the house or subway station, and then stolen it. Such Bophish crimes are committed with an unspecified number of victims, and it is not easy for the Defendant to arrest the offender, even if they were to have a significant adverse effect on society, and even if they were to take part in such Bophishing crimes, it is necessary to strictly punish the victims of theft and intrusion into each of the instant motor vehicles [the victims of the instant theft and intrusion are older than 70 years old, which might cause considerable mental harm to the victims of the instant crime without any special reason.]