1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 21, 2016, Nonparty B participated in the training (hereinafter “instant training”) held on June 21, 201, from D&D located in Hongcheon-gun, Gangwon-do, as a caregiver, while working as a caregiver at C&C (hereinafter “the instant medical care center”).

B. B around 07:00 on June 22, 2016, around 07:00, at the guest room of the above container, they were sent back to the E Hospital located in Chuncheon-si and was hospitalized immediately without any awareness. On the 29th of the same month, around 04:10 on the 29th of the same month, they died of cerebrovascular, a middle secretary, and a long-term dives of direct death.

(hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”). (c)

On April 26, 2017, the Plaintiff, the deceased’s spouse, claimed the bereaved family’s benefits and funeral expenses that the deceased’s death constituted an occupational accident. On the other hand, the Defendant decided not to pay bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses on the ground that the deceased’s death does not constitute an occupational accident (hereinafter “instant disposition”). On April 26, 2017, the Defendant appears to have died due to cerebrovascular from an existing disease, cerebral father’s disease, and the cerebral father’s death, and the cerebral father’s death, and that the cerebral father’s work hours were excessive. In addition, there was no special burden to the extent that the deceased’s death does not constitute an occupational accident.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the deceased worked for about nine (9) years at the Medical Center as a caregiver, was exposed to physical overwork and mental stress, and had been accumulated to a long-term off night shift work, resulting in the death of the deceased, following his night work and the rapid aggravation of the existing disease. As such, the deceased’s death constitutes occupational accidents.

The instant disposition is unlawful on a different premise.

(b) relation.