logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.10.17 2013가합5707
관리비
Text

1. The Plaintiff, Defendant B, 125,769, 395,543, 177,277, and 131,793, and 131,793, respectively.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The following facts are not disputed between the parties, or may be acknowledged by taking into account each entry of Gap evidence 1 through 8, evidence 10 through 12, evidence 17 through 21 (including each number, if any), part of witness I's testimony and whole purport of oral argument:

On January 1, 201, the Plaintiff, a corporation operating building management business, etc., concluded a comprehensive contract on the instant commercial building (hereinafter “instant contract”) with L, the owner of the building and L, the owner of the building, and the term of the contract from January 1, 201 to December 31, 2015, which is five years from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2015.

On June 2012, the Plaintiff received KRW 122,110,592 from December 2, 2007 to September 2009 on L, which is the former management company of the instant commercial building. From February 2013, the Plaintiff received KRW 69,445,300 from October 2009 to December 2010 on L, which is the former management company of the instant commercial building. The Plaintiff notified L, which is the debtor, of the transfer of credit at the time of the said transfer.

At the time of completion of the aggregate building consisting of 22 sectionally owned buildings which was completed on December 3, 2007 for the business facilities of the 2nd floor, the 8th floor above ground, and the purpose of neighborhood living facilities, the registration of preservation of ownership was completed in the name of L for all sectionally owned buildings at the time of completion. I purchased 801 from L on January 10, 208 from among the instant commercial buildings, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of M on January 29, 2008. The Defendants are as follows.

As shown in the table of Paragraph 1, some buildings of the commercial buildings of this case were sold at a successful bid and acquired ownership.

On the other hand, the Defendants acquired management expenses and ownership for common areas in arrears before acquiring ownership of the building of the commercial building of this case.

arrow