logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.01.18 2017고단861
특수폭행치상등
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Seized knife knife (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant and D are married married couple on March 2017, and the victim E is the friendship of the defendant.

From May 30, 2017, the Defendant, along with “Gel” located in E and Chuncheon City F, went to the said knife with knife (14.2cm in blade, No. 1) which is a dangerous object at the Defendant’s home, and went to the said knife with knife (14.2cm in blade, No. 1).

The written indictment states to the effect that “the Defendant stated that her wife D and her victim E together with her other friendships are in the telecom.”

However, according to the evidence, D asks the defendant to whom the Dobbbbbbbbbbs in the teleur, E asks him to go.

It is recognized that the telephone was true, and there was sufficient arguments between the parties on this part of the facts, and the correction is made ex officio as above, since it does not interfere with the defendant's right of defense.

1. The Defendant damaged special property at around 04:48 on May 30, 2017, at around 04:48, and at around 205, the Defendant arrived at GMoel 205, and the Defendant visited the victim H to a knife without opening a indoor-house visit, and damaged the victim H’s visit to the extent that the market price is repair cost.

The written indictment states to the effect that “the door was set off in the knife with D and E without opening a visit.”

However, according to evidence, the above telecom 205 opened an entrance and opened a entrance and opened a entrance, and there is a separate structure of double-structure, in which there are small entrances and toilets and visits into a bed room, and D opened a entrance and a entrance from a toilet and opened a entrance at almost 205 when the defendant went into the toilet, and the defendant went into the toilet at almost 205. At the time, the defendant was able to talk with D in the vicinity of 205 entrance, and E did not open a visit into the indoor room, and this part of the facts concerning this.

arrow