logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.10.13 2017고단5533
현주건조물방화예비
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on April 2017, 2017, posted a ample, ampample, ample, and performed a good in front of the Nam-gu Incheon National History, and received a warning from a public official belonging to the Nam-gu Incheon National Office to the control official belonging to the Nam-gu Office. On April 23, 2017, around 16:03, the Defendant saw the plastic plosle, which was prepared in advance for the purpose of destroying the building of the above Gu office, into the Seodong-gu Incheon National University-dong Incheon National University, and discarded the plastic plosle, which was prepared in advance for the purpose of destroying the building of the Gu office.

“To enter the building of the above Gu office with sound,” but the police assigned for special guard belonging to the above Gu office prepared fire prevention against the building in which people are present because they could not enter the building of the above Gu office due to the removal of the registered security guard belonging to the above Gu office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A police seizure protocol (voluntary submission), and a list of seizure;

1. Written response to a request for appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of seized articles;

1. Articles 175 and 164 (1) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation is that the Defendant, while performing a good, was given a peep in a public performance and was given a warning from a public official of the South-dong and Dong Office to commit the instant crime, and the Defendant’s quality is not good in light of the background and mode of the relevant crime.

The defendant's crime is likely to cause a lot of casualties and property loss through fire, so it is highly dangerous, and the motive of the crime is also bad.

The defendant has a past record of criminal punishment exceeding 20 times, and among them, has three criminal records and two criminal records of suspended execution.

However, the defendant shows that the defendant recognized the crime in this court, and shows a strong reflectivity.

The defendant does not make any particular resistance after cutting the gasoline walk possessed by the police assigned for special guard.

arrow