1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 50,000,000 for the Plaintiff and KRW 2% for the period from February 12, 2014 to May 31, 2014, and the following.

1. Determination on the claim for refund of deposit for lease

A. The plaintiff's assertion between the defendant's representative Eul and Eul, the defendant's agent, entered into a contract on the supply of the first flowers to the defendant's E funeral hall and the lease of the store in the place of the contract, and even if there was no authority to conclude the contract on behalf of the defendant to conclude the contract on behalf of the defendant, since C had justifiable grounds to believe that the plaintiff had the authority to conclude the contract on behalf of the defendant, the expression agent is established under Article 126 or 129 of the Civil Act. Even if not, the defendant did not raise any objection with the knowledge of the plaintiff's installation of container and the operation of the store in the funeral hall, and thereby confirmed the unauthorized representation of C.

Therefore, the above contract's effect on the defendant. Since the defendant's closure of the funeral hall and demanded the plaintiff to suspend the plaintiff's business, the plaintiff terminated the above contract by delivering a copy of the complaint of this case, and sought a return of the total amount of KRW 270,000,000 (=170,000,000,000,000,000,000) and damages for delay.

B. Determination 1) According to the written evidence Nos. 2-1 and 2-2 of the contract between the Plaintiff and C, the Plaintiff is the other party to the contract, and the Plaintiff wishes to supply a single fireworks within the E funeral hall on May 3, 2013 (hereinafter “the contract for the supply of a single fireworks”).

(B) On June 5, 2013, a contract to lease a store in the E funeral hall (hereinafter “sales store lease contract”) (hereinafter “the instant contract”) is deemed to include each contract.

2) On May 1, 2013, the defendant delegated all of the co-ownership of the co-ownership of the entrusted person B, E contents E funeral home (the co-ownership of the so-called "the so-called co-ownership of the so-called "the so-called co-ownership of the so-called "the so-called co-ownership of the so-called "the so-called co-ownership of the so-called co-ownership of the so-called co-ownership of the so-called "the so-called co-ownership of the so-called co-ownership)" to the