1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A is within the scope of property inherited from deceased C (D students, death in March 29, 2013).

1. As to the plaintiff's claim against the defendant A

A. 1) The facts acknowledged by the Plaintiff’s determination as to the cause of the claim against the above Defendant are as shown in the cause of the claim. In light of the facts acknowledged above, the above Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the same money as stated in the purport of the claim, barring any special circumstance, as stated in the Plaintiff’s claim. In light of the facts acknowledged above, the above Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the same money as stated in the grounds of claim.

B. 1) The above defendant's defense that the above defendant should pay the money as stated in the purport of the claim to the plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased C. Thus, in the case of the Incheon Family Court's 2017-Madan1633 inheritance approval, the above defendant's defense that the above defendant's judgment became final and conclusive after being sentenced to "the report of limited acceptance is accepted" in the inheritance of the decedent C's property by the deceased's 2017-Madan 1633, can be recognized by taking into account the overall purport of the pleadings in Gap evidence No. 7 and Eul evidence No. 1, the above defendant's defense of the qualified acceptance of the contents of the above defendant's above is reasonable.

C. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the above defendant is reasonable within the scope of the above acknowledged, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

2. As to the plaintiff's claim against the defendant B

A. The plaintiff's ground for the claim against the above defendant: The ground for the claim is stated in the attached Form.

(b) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act;