logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.02.20 2017고정635
개인정보보호법위반
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged in this case

A. Defendant A did not go through B’s wife B, and received a request from B to request for the pollution of pictures taken with the non-wheeled surface of C, and received KRW 3,300,000 from B on November 5, 2016, Defendant C did not go through C from his residence located in Sung-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Busan, and transmitted to B a photograph taken with his name and a photograph taken by C at a place of access to the said hotel at around 16:00 on the same day.

As a result, the Defendant provided C’s photograph, which is personal information, to B without the consent of C, which is the subject of information.

B. On November 5, 2016, Defendant B, while knowing that A did not obtain the consent of C, was provided with photographs taken by A, which had been taken by a male infinite name and the entrance to the said hotel.

As a result, the Defendant was provided with C’s photograph even without the consent of C, which is the subject of information.

2. Article 71 Subparag. 1 of the Personal Information Protection Act provides that a person who provides a third party with personal information without the consent of a subject of information in violation of Article 17(1) and a person who receives such personal information with the knowledge of such fact shall be punished. Article 17(1) provides that a “personal information manager” may obtain consent from a subject of information or provide such personal information within the scope of the intended purpose of collection. As such, the act of providing personal information by a “personal information manager” and the act of receiving such personal information without permission is punished pursuant to Articles 71 Subparag. 1 and 17(1) of the aforementioned Act.

Therefore, the premise for recognizing the facts charged in the instant case is whether Defendant A constitutes “personal information manager” or “personal information manager.”

In Article 2, subparagraph 5 of the Personal Information Protection Act of Korea, "Personal Information manager" is to operate a personal information file for the purpose of performing his/her duties.

arrow