The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendants not guilty

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the Defendants filed a complaint against F as stated in the instant facts charged by the Defendants is not false but true.

Nevertheless, the court below found the Defendants guilty of the facts charged in this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged and the summary of the judgment of the court below of this case are as follows: "Defendant A is the actual operator of D (ju) and Defendant B is the representative director under the name of the above company. Defendant A, while carrying out construction works after being ordered to do so from the (ju) Dozon on March 2009, he borrowed a total of KRW 340 million from April 10, 2009 to December 20, 209 due to insufficient construction funds, and Defendant B borrowed a total of KRW 150,000,000 from 20,000,000 won until December 20, 2009 to 30,000,000 won from 1.5,000 won from 20,000 won from 30,000 won from 20,000 won from 30,000 won from 20,000 won from 30,000 won from 209,00.