1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 12, 1926, with respect to the North-gu Seoul metropolitan area 89 square meters (hereinafter “instant land before the instant subdivision”), M ownership transfer registration has been filed on August 10, 1926 on the grounds of sale on August 10, 1926.

B. On August 8, 2012, the instant land prior to the instant partition was divided into the instant land with a large of 84 square meters and a large of 5 square meters (hereinafter “each of the instant land”).

C. On the above K ground of the building ledger, a wooden house of 26.45 square meters (hereinafter “instant building”) is constructed, and N is registered as having acquired the ownership of the instant building on or around February 1951.

Each of the lands of this case is currently constructed with cement block structure, the current status of which is different from the above building ledger.

E. M died on May 6, 1968, and the Defendants jointly inherited M’s property for each share listed in the attached inheritance share sheet.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 11, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and video Nos. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) Q purchased the land and the housing of this case before the division of this case from M and delivered them to R R's house at the time of the Japanese occupation. The plaintiff's wife died before R's occupation. N purchased the above land and the housing of this case from Q around 1964, and sold them to the plaintiff's father (the father) around October 27, 1974 to the plaintiff's director on the housing of this case, and resided on December 1, 1995. On February 1, 199, the plaintiff succeeded to the land of this case before the division of this case and the housing of this case were newly constructed the housing of this case on the land of this case to the plaintiff as the fire block of this case. After the plaintiff's occupation, the plaintiff continued to occupy the land of this case and sold it to the plaintiff around 191.

3..