logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2012.07.17 2012고정111
업무상과실치상
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding 2.5 million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Criminal facts are recognized by rhymizing the facts charged without changing the indictment to the extent that there is no risk of substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his/her right of defense based on clear evidence, such as

The Defendant, who is staying in B at the time of the stay of the Defendant, has 4 mags at the end of the Defendant’s residence and live in the next house, and is likely to attack the openings due to considerable weight of the above openings. As such, the Defendant, even though he had a duty of care to prevent in advance the attack of the openings by isolationing the openings through fences, etc., and by neglecting it at the above end on April 15, 2012 and causing about 1 mag (1 year and 5 months after the birth, 20km, 50 g) from among the dogs where the Defendant is staying in the house above the Defendant due to an occupational negligence, thereby causing the victim to wear the left side of the victim C (6 years of age) and two ears, thereby causing the victim to suffer approximately 3 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on photographs and damaged photographs;

1. In full view of the facts constituting an offense, pertinent Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 268(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of a fine (the fact that one million won is deposited for the victim to recover part of damage, etc.), and the following facts: (a) the number of times indicated in evidence; (b) the number of maths; (c) the shape of maths; and (d) the shape of maths; and (e) the victim, who is a young child, appears to have been frequently rare in the said math; and (b) the Defendant’s appearance of math in Eth and 4 maths ought to be deemed to be the content of the obligation to prevent danger and injury to human life and body as a job incidental to Eth and continuously engaged in a social life by virtue of one position; and

arrow