A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 4, 2017, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol of 0.122% among blood transfusions, driven B Haststa car at the front of the restaurant at Kimpo-dong, Pung-dong, Pung-dong, Gung-dong, Gung-dong, Gung-si, and the bottom of the sea area at the same distance as Kimpo-si, while driving at the front of the restaurant at Kimpo-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigation report (report on the situation of the driver in charge); and

1. The provisions of Acts and subordinate statutes that make a statement on the circumstances of a driver driving, notify the results of crackdown on drinking driving, and apply to reports on the circumstances of driving;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Order of Education and the Order of Community Service need to be strictly punished in light of the risk of drinking driving. The higher alcohol level in blood is 0.122%, the record of punishment for the same kind of crime is three times, and one of them is favorable: recognition of and reflects the mistake that one of them is sentenced to imprisonment and a suspended execution: The fact that the person does not cause a traffic accident due to drinking of this case, and the fact that the person does not cause a traffic accident due to drinking of this case is determined as ordered by taking into account the following factors: the motive and circumstance of the crime and the circumstances after the crime, etc.