logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.06.29 2017고단550
건설산업기본법위반
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant E was sentenced to one year of a suspended sentence of four months for a crime of violation of road traffic law (unlicensed driving) in the support of Sung-nam branch of Suwon branch on September 29, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 7, 2016.

[2017 Highest 550 Criminal facts] No person shall contract or execute construction works by using the name or trade name of the constructor, or receive a lease of the constructor's construction business registration certificate or construction business registration pocket book, and the constructor shall conduct construction works concerning the construction or substantial repair of a building.

1. Even if Defendant A is not a constructor, on March 2016, Defendant A lent a comprehensive construction business license of G Co., Ltd. to five million won from his/her employees in the field of new construction works near Gwangju City on March 2016, at the early 2016.

4. 8. Around that time, the Plaintiff filed a report, etc. on the commencement of construction works with respect to G, a company with jurisdiction over G, to perform new construction works for three and three different generations, including Gyeonggi-si, Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si, and construction of multi-household houses (a total floor area of 794.79mm2, each of which is 79m2) in three and three parcels, including Gwangju-si, and H

2. Although Defendant B is not a constructor, on February 4, 2016, the Defendant leased his/her comprehensive construction business license to 3 million won from his/her employees due to the name and influence in the name of J at the site of new construction works in the area of Ansan-gu, Mayang-si, and submitted to the competent authority around May of the same month a report, etc. on the commencement of construction works for the construction of a multi-household, non-party I and a multi-household (413.49mm2) at the same time, the Defendant constructed and constructed multi-family housing outside Manyang-gu, Mayang-gu, and one multi-household (413.49m2) at the same time.

3. Even if Defendant C is not a constructor, on January 1, 2016, the Defendant leased 3 million won a comprehensive construction business license of J Co., Ltd. to the competent authorities around the 11st of the same month, from the name and infinite employees of J at the site of a new construction project near Gwangju City, the Defendant leased 3 million won to the Plaintiff’s comprehensive construction business license of J Co., Ltd.

arrow