logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.06.30 2014가단51227
명도등
Text

1. The defendant delivers to the plaintiff the building stated in the attached list, and from December 2, 2014, the above building is the same.

Reasons

1. Indication of Claim: Attached Form No. 1. The plaintiff lawfully acquired ownership of a building as stated in the order No. 1 on December 2, 2014, and thus only receives a claim for delivery of a building based on ownership and a claim for restitution of unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent arising after the date of registration of ownership transfer. However, the plaintiff shall not accept the remainder of the claim for the principal and the incidental claim against the above unjust enrichment as lack of evidence to support it, and the proviso of Article 101 of the Civil Procedure Act shall apply to the burden of litigation costs. 2. The judgment of confession (Article 208(3)2 and the main sentence of Article 150(3) and the main sentence of paragraph (1) of the Civil Procedure Act)

arrow