1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B indicated in the attached Form No. 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 28, among the 922 square meters in the Nansan-gun of Chungcheongnam-gun N.Y.

1. As to the party, land, and building specification

A. Defendant E, a successor to the network T related to Defendant E’s family, (Appointed Party), P, Q, R, and S are called “Defendant E, P, Q, R, and S,” and all of them are called “Defendant E’s family.”

B. Defendant F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M, the heir of Defendant F’s family-related network U and V, together with all of Defendant F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M. “Defendant F’s family.”

C. The NN land related to each of the instant lands is the “N land of this case” and the “O land of Geumsan-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do,” and both land are added to the “O land of this case” and “each of the instant lands”.

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant E’s family members and Defendant B

A. The Plaintiff’s primary claim 1) Defendant E’s family is co-owners of (iv) land units and (v) ground warehouses, and Defendant B occupies the said housing units and warehouses.

B) Accordingly, Defendant B, the owner of the instant N land, is obligated to leave the said NE’s house and warehouse; ② Defendant E’s family members are obligated to remove the said house and warehouse; and (2) to deliver each parcel of land (iv) and (v) part (v). Defendant E’s family members are the owner of the instant NE’s housing and warehouse; (b) Defendant B is obligated to remove the said house and warehouse from the said house and warehouse; and (v) to deliver each parcel of land to the Plaintiff, the owner of the instant NE, who is the owner of the instant NE’s land, and to deliver each parcel of land (v).

B. (iv) Defendant E’s family asserting that the owner of the above above ground housing and (v) above ground warehouse are owned by Defendant E’s family, and Defendant B asserts that the above housing and (v) above ground warehouse are owned by Defendant E’s family. The Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant E’s family and Defendant B is a claim that is legally incompatible and legally recognized depending on regardless of whether the ownership of the above housing is attributed.