The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On April 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a bicycle around 12:39 on the charge of the instant case; (b) driven a two-lane in the direction of the inner station in the direction of the railroad station in the direction of the railroad station, along with the second two-lane letter of the 19-lane church, as Seoul Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu.

In the case of driving a bicycle, there was a duty of care to prevent the accident by driving the bicycle safely by examining the traffic conditions on the front side and the right side according to the normal direction of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was driven by the victim B who was driven by the bypassing from the back road due to the mistake that the yellow solid line was driven by the center line beyond the center line.

C The front part of the small cargo vehicle was faced with the bicycle driven by the defendant, and damaged the damaged vehicle to have an amount equivalent to KRW 1,071,596.

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

According to the records, the facts can be acknowledged by submitting a written agreement to this court on June 2, 2017, which was after the institution of this prosecution by the victim D (the victim is stated as B in the indictment, but the owner of the damaged vehicle must be deemed as D). Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.