1. Defendant D’s KRW 604,049,885, and KRW 540,00,000 to Plaintiff C and each of them on November 201.

(2) On April 19, 201, Defendant FF Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant F”) entered into a management consulting agreement with the intent to engage in the water-take business from each of the stated real estate, providing management consulting services regarding the purchase of each of the said real estate (hereinafter “Defendant F”).

(hereinafter “instant consulting contract”). Of the terms and conditions of the instant consulting contract, the parts relating to the instant case are as follows:

Article 1 (Details of Consulting Services) The period of service under Article 2 (Period of Consultation) shall be the date on which the purchase of land is completed from the date of commencement of the service.

Article 3 (Expenses for Management Consulting Services)

1. The success fees for management consulting shall be KRW 350,000,000 (including value-added tax) per day.

2. A shall pay the full amount of consulting costs to the designated account of Defendant F on the date of land contract.

*Matters of special agreement - In the event of a dispute over ownership on the land purchased in relation to Article 1, defendant F will settle the dispute at the responsibility and cost of defendant F.

- In addition, if the ownership dispute over the purchased land arises and the ownership of A is invalidated, Defendant F will compensate A for the double the amount of the contingent fee for management consulting services under Article 3 within one week from the date the invalidation becomes final and conclusive.

2) According to the instant consulting contract, Defendant F’s audit M had arranged a sales contract between A and Plaintiff C and Defendant D. In this process, M negotiated with the Plaintiffs on behalf of Defendant D. Accordingly, Defendant D purchased, on May 19, 201, the real estate Nos. 1 through 6 as indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate No. 1”) in KRW 990,000,000 (hereinafter “instant first sale”), and the Plaintiff C purchased the real estate No. 7 through 16 as indicated in the separate sheet on the same day.