1. The defendant is against the plaintiff (appointed party).

A. Attached Form 2 among the real estate indicated in the “Indication of Real Estate” attached hereto.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments written in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including a branch number) as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff (appointed party) and the defendant, the representative of Eul and the defendant, on June 23, 2017, connected each point of (a) part (a) of the attached Table Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 18.18 square meters in sequence among the real estate indicated in the attached Table No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 18.18 square meters in the ship (hereinafter “instant store”) among the real estate indicated in the attached Table No. 1 through No. 4 (including a branch number), shall be the lease agreement of this case, setting the monthly rent of KRW 2,00,000 and the period from May 23, 2017 to May 22, 2018.

(2) On May 23, 2018, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Defendant changed the terms of the instant lease agreement to increase the rent of KRW 2.10,00 per month and renewed it. The Defendant paid only the rent up to December 2017, and thereafter, notified the Defendant of the fact that the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) did not pay the rent in arrears around October 2019. Accordingly, the Defendant delivered the instant store to the Plaintiff, and, barring any other special circumstances, transferred the instant store to December 24, 2018 to December 2019, the Defendant asserted that the Defendant was not obligated to pay the Plaintiff 2,000,000 won from the first place of delivery to December 24, 2019 (the first place of delivery to the Plaintiff’s 2,000,000 won from the second place of delivery to the second place of delivery to the second place of delivery to the Plaintiff’s 2,019. The Defendant asserted that the Defendant was not obligated to pay the Plaintiff 2, respectively, the Plaintiff’s party to the instant lease agreement.