logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2014.04.10 2013고단1192
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

gallon thallons 21 (No. 1) and gallon 31 gallon.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On August 30, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Western District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on September 12, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

"2013 Highest 1192"

1. On December 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) acquired one cell phone 700,000 won in Samsung Gggal ju City, where the victim lost his name in a bus terminal in the city shuttle-dong, which was located in Chuncheon City, from the city bus terminal male toilets, at around 15:10,01.

The Defendant did not take necessary procedures, such as returning the acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

2. At around 18:00 on December 16, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened a safe door in the E store operated by the victim C in Yancheon-gun, Gangwon-do; (b) removed the sum of KRW 17,000,000, totaling of KRW 17,000,000, which is the victim’s possession, of the victim’s right to KRW 1,000,000, 1, O, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2,000, and 1,000,0000, which is owned by the victim, continuously kept under the display stand; and (c) cut it with one cellular phone of KRW 90,00,00, a market price of KRW 1,067,000.

"2014 Highest 125"

1. Fraud;

A. On December 8, 2013, at around 11:49, the Defendant posted a letter “pop-up store” on the “pop-up store” on the bulletin board of the estest rice Luxembourg market in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, and then told the victim F (year 00) who has believed and contacted the cop-up store, and received KRW 250,000 from the victim who believed it as if he sold it to the new bank account (G) in the name of the Defendant.

In fact, even if the Defendant received the transfer of the sales proceeds from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to send the crowdfunding to the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim by the above method, and deceiving it from the victim.

arrow