1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part concerning the revocation of the disposition of rejecting the disclosure of information pertaining to the information listed in attached Table 1 List 1.

Details of the disposition

On August 9, 2017, the Plaintiff asserted that the police officer B, who was an investigator in charge of the case, such as fraud of his lawsuit against the Plaintiff, committed an investigation error in the investigation process of the instant case, and filed a petition for the punishment of B as a neglect of duty.

On October 2017, the Ulsan District Police Agency announced the Plaintiff on the following: “The result of the examination by holding an investigative review committee to terminate the internal investigation and the disciplinary opinion on the abandonment of duties was decided by the investigation department. The National Police Agency seems to refer the main office to the National Police Agency. The matters to be resolved will be notified to the Plaintiff.”

On April 16, 2018, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to disclose to the public the “information of this case, including each information listed in the separate sheet No. 1 list,” the evidence submitted by B in the investigation of the Seoul Regional Police Agency, and the opinion and deliberation of the members of the Deliberation Committee on B’s investigation errors, as a result of the deliberation, the Defendant’s request for disciplinary decision submitted to the Disciplinary Committee, the opinion of the members of the Disciplinary Deliberation Committee, etc. (hereinafter “instant information”).

On April 27, 2018, the Defendant’s opinion and opinion of the members of the Deliberation Committee on B’s investigation errors among the instant information are that of the members of the Disciplinary Committee’s meetings (Article 20 of the Decree on Disciplinary Action against Public Officials and the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”).

(1) Article 9(1)1 of the Information Disclosure Act (Article 9(1)6 of the Information Disclosure Act) and Article 9(1)1 of the Information including each information listed in the separate sheet No. 1 shall be closed to the public on the ground that it constitutes “information with respect to an individual, which, if disclosed, is likely to infringe on the privacy or freedom of private life.”

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). The Plaintiff’s ground for disciplinary action B against the Defendant on April 27, 2018 is as follows.