The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. The Defendants are members of the Democratic Labor Relations Commission belonging to the Malaysia.

On May 18, 2014, at around 01:50, the Defendants demanded D’s interview during the participation in the Sewol ferry 618-1 Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Police Station, Mapo-gu, Seoul, which was 618-1, but, on the other hand, Defendant A was able to enter the said police station by blocking 20 minutes of the 20-day door, including where the FF police vehicle operated by E is unable to enter the police station.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to prevent the front of the Mapo Police Station from passing through the road, thereby hindering the traffic.

2. The purpose of general traffic obstruction is to punish all acts that cause damage to or infusing a road, etc. or significantly impede traffic by causing damage to or infusing a road, etc., or interference with traffic by other means, and therefore, the act of temporary interference with traffic of a vehicle is not deemed to be an act that makes it impossible or significantly impede traffic due to the obstruction of traffic, and thus, it does not constitute a general traffic obstruction.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2008Do10560 Decided January 30, 2009, etc.). In light of the above legal principles, according to the records, the Defendant’s demand for a meeting of D’s visit from the date and place indicated in the facts charged, and as a result, the Defendant’s refusal to demand a meeting of D’s visit during the participation in the Sewol ferry drilling at the place, and as a result, the police officers and the Si guard at the place were set on the crosswalk in front of the Mapo Police Station, and thus, the police vehicles could not enter the Mapo Police Station.

However, the defendants occupied the above place.