The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The following facts are favorable to the Defendant.

The defendant recognized the crime of this case and is against the law.

In the court below, the defendant agreed with G and M only, and the above victims want to have the defendant's wife.

Most of the theft damage victims G, M and J were returned to victims.

On the other hand, the following is disadvantageous.

Defendant has been punished at least ten times, including punishment for the same kind of crime.

In particular, as soon as the execution of punishment for the same kind of crime is completed, the crime of this case has been committed again during the period of repeated crime.

The victim from the crime of this case reached six persons, and the amount of damage reaches about KRW 126 million.

Most of the damages were not compensated.

In addition, various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the background of the crime in this case, circumstances after the crime in this case, defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., and the scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines set by the Sentencing Committee (2 years and six months to seven months) / [the scope of recommended punishment] general fraud area (2 years and six years from June to six years), the aggravated area (2 years from the date of special aggravation), / [the scope of recommended punishment] the second crime (thief) of the same type of repeated crime [the scope of recommended punishment] basic area (2 months from January to June) of the basic area (the scope of recommended punishment) (the scope of punishment by the prosecutor is less than the final sentencing criteria set forth in the 2 years to six years and six months from the date of recommendation], and the prosecutor's assertion that general larceny in general property is less than the final sentencing criteria set forth in the 2 years and six years and six months from the date of recommendation.