Text
Of the part against Defendant Gold Industry Co., Ltd. in the judgment of the first instance, the following additional payments are ordered.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiff is a party in the position of the plaintiff. A apartment (six Dong Dong, 277 households, hereinafter referred to as "the apartment of this case") located in the old city B in the Gumi-si.
The Defendant Gold Industry is an autonomous management body organized by occupants for the management of the apartment of this case. The Defendant Gold Livestock Industry is a contractor of the apartment of this case. The Defendant Gold Livestock Industry is a contract under which the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association shall pay the warranty bond in the event that the Defendant Gold Industry, a contractor, fails to perform the repair obligation upon receipt of a request for repair of defects in the construction of the apartment of this case during the warranty period, as described in the following table (hereinafter “each warranty contract of this case”).
A guarantee company is a guarantee company that has concluded a guarantee period and issued each guarantee period. The guarantee period of the guaranteed business is 19,010 to April 29, 2011, 201; 247,546,0723 from April 29 to April 28, 2012; 208,036,858484 to April 29, 2010 to April 28, 201; 247,546,0723 from April 29, 2010 to April 28, 2012; 208 Asian companies, including the designation of a housing site creation work to April 29, 201 to April 28, 201; 208 Asian companies, 206-4, 206, 208 Asian companies, and 37,58-4,67,201, 205-4, 2015.
Asian Trust is a company that entered into the instant trust contract with the number of corporations and constructed the instant apartment and sold it to the buyers.
B. As to the completion of the instant apartment, the instant apartment was completed on April 29, 2010 and the inspection for use was conducted.
(c) the Defendant Franchising industry where the defect occurred.