1. The analysis and analysis of the judgment of the lower court on July 6, 2016, which the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiffs on July 6, 2016.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 13, 2012, the Seoul Southern District Court rendered a decision to dismiss the plaintiffs' claim on the following grounds: 156 workers employed by both companies including the plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as " Both companies") filed a lawsuit against both companies, including nullification of dismissal.

The plaintiffs, etc. appealed against the above judgment of the first instance, and the Seoul High Court revoked the above judgment of the first instance on February 7, 2014 and sentenced the plaintiff's winning judgment.

Both motor vehicles filed an appeal against the above appellate judgment, and the Supreme Court rendered the judgment of reversal and return on November 13, 2014.

On May 27, 2016, the Seoul High Court (Seoul High Court) rendered a judgment dismissing the appeal by the Plaintiffs, etc., and the Plaintiffs, etc. appealed to the Supreme Court on July 12, 2016, but the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by the Plaintiffs, etc. on September 28, 2016.

(hereinafter referred to as "relevant civil procedure"). (b)

On the other hand, on February 19, 2014, after the judgment of the appellate court for the reversal, transmission, and transmission, the Financial Supervisory Service drafted a document (the document in Paragraph 1; hereinafter “instant information”) stating “the analysis and review of the contents of the judgment related to the second instance court’s lawsuit for the invalidation of dismissal of two vehicles.”

C. On June 27, 2016, the Plaintiffs requested the Defendant to disclose the instant information.

On July 6, 2016, the Defendant determined that the instant information was confidential pursuant to Article 9(1)4, 5, and 7 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”) on the ground that “the disclosure of the instant information may seriously interfere with the fair performance of supervisory duties, and the instant information includes information corresponding to the management and trade secrets of the company subject to supervision.” In addition, the instant information is likely to affect the deliberation or decision of the trial if disclosed as information related to the trial currently in progress.”

(c).