logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원서산지원 2020.09.24 2020고단583
어선법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,00, and a fine of KRW 500,000 shall apply to Defendant B Company.

Defendant

A above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B A Co., Ltd. is a company that carries on the business of manufacturing vessels in the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and Defendant A is the representative director of the above company, and Co-Defendant D prior to the separation is an owner of the fishing vessel E (9.77 tons) shipped in Gunsan-si and is engaged in the fishing vessel business as

Any person who intends to change the details entered in a fishing vessel inspection certificate shall undergo a temporary inspection, and shall not use a fishing vessel for navigation or fishing operations without undergoing a fishing vessel inspection.

1. On October 11, 2017, Defendant A and D entered into a shipbuilding agreement with the said B office stating that “A shall build a fishing vessel according to the salvb and salvous fishing.” After undergoing the inspection of the fishing vessel built as above, Defendant A and Defendant A extended the upper structure of the said fishing vessel and delivered the upper part of the vessel to Defendant A.

Accordingly, around April 16, 2018, D was the first regular inspection of the above fishing vessel built under the above contract from an inspector in the name of the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries who belongs to the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, and Defendant A did not undergo the fishing vessel inspection even though the gross tonnage was expanded from 9.77 tons to 11 tons by adding or enlarging the power department and the structure of the above fishing vessel at the above B office during the day of approximately a week from around that time.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with D and used a fishing vessel for navigation or operation without undergoing a fishing vessel inspection.

2. Defendant B, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), the Defendant, a representative director of the Defendant, committed a violation regarding the Defendant’s business as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the defendant A and the defendant B corporation

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to F of the protocol of interrogation of a police suspect A to the police interrogation protocol of the F, a copy of fishing vessel drawings, fishing vessel records, fishing vessel records, vessel photographs, shipping certificates, and fishing vessel

1. The relevant Article of criminal facts and the defendant A who is selected to commit a crime: The Fishing Vessels Act;

arrow