A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Customs Act;

A. The Defendant is the representative of C, a primary exporter, who violated the Customs Act by smuggling export.

If it is intended to export goods, the item, standard, quantity and price of the relevant goods and other matters prescribed by Presidential Decree shall be reported to the head of the relevant customs office, and no goods shall be exported different from those on

Although the registration of cancellation for export of used cars is required for the purpose of export of used cars, the Defendant, by means of altering the detailed statement of export declaration for another motor vehicle already issued to export for the purpose of export because it is impossible to cancel the vehicle, or by driving it for export by shipping instead of an export declaration after receiving an export declaration as a normally possible vehicle.

On March 21, 2011, the Defendant received an export declaration (report number No. D) from the head of Incheon Customs Office around March 21, 201.

After that, on March 26, 2011, the Defendant changed the “AVNTE 2007 F” to the model and specification column of the export declaration completion certificate from the office of Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City as a method of inserting the paper to the part indicated “AVNT 1997 D” in the model and specification column of the export declaration completion certificate, and then exported the G vessel through the Incheon Port.

Accordingly, the Defendant reported and exported goods different from the export goods.

Around January 16, 2012, the Defendant continued to export a motor vehicle of 1996 from Incheon to receive an export declaration (report number H) as if it were exported of the motor vehicle of 1996, and then actually exported the motor vehicle of 13,400,000 at the market price which was not reported to the head of the customs office.

Accordingly, the Defendant reported and exported goods different from the export goods.

The Defendant, including this, from March 26, 201.