logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 특허법원 2015.01.29 2014허4715
거절결정(특)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Name of the invention 1) invention in this case: B) divisional filing date/original filing date/application number: C/D/E 3: The applicant: The claim and main drawings of the invention in this case are as shown in attached Form 1.

B. The cited inventions 1 and 2 are all applied by the Plaintiff.

Invention 1 is not used as specific data to determine inventive step, and its main text is not to be used as specific data.

The descriptions and drawings of the contents shall be omitted.

1) Cited Invention 1 (No. 4) pertains to the “information system using maps” inserted in No. 199-33843 of the Domestic Utility Model Gazette published on August 16, 199. 2) Cited Invention 2 (No. 5) is related to the “information by using maps” published in No. 1998-21769 of the Domestic Patent Gazette published on June 25, 1998, and its main drawings are as shown in the annex No. 2.

C. On January 28, 2011, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office issued a notice of the submission of his/her opinion on the grounds that the nonobviousness of the patent application in question could be easily claimed by a person with ordinary knowledge in the technical field to which the invention pertains (hereinafter “ordinary technician”) based on comparable invention 1, and thus, the nonobviousness of the patent application in question was denied.

3) On March 28, 2011, the Plaintiff amended the specification as stated in attached Form 1-1(1). On November 30, 2011, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office rendered a decision of refusal to grant a patent on the ground that the patent invention of this case amended as mentioned above was denied inasmuch as an ordinary skilled person could easily make an invention by comparable invention 1. (4) On January 4, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an appeal against the said decision of refusal with the Intellectual Property Tribunal (2012won 110).

On October 12, 2012, the Korean Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board(Korean Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board)(Korean Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board) is the first application date.

arrow