1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff A’s status as the parties is the wife of the network G, the rest of the Plaintiffs are the children of the network G, and Defendant E is the wife of the network H, the south of the network G, and Defendant F is the children of the network H.

B. On April 6, 1971, the network G is limited to the “I” of the wife population I (hereinafter referred to as “the above address”).

(3) On October 25, 1974, the 3,458 square meters prior to J, K Dae-479 square meters, and on May 1, 1975, the 1st real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “the 1st land”).

The real estate listed in the remaining Schedule is called 2 to 7 land in order.

2) On February 9, 1989, each purchase of J and completed the registration of transfer of ownership. 2) The size of 3,458 square meters prior to J (hereinafter “Mamo-land”) was divided into four parcels, including 2,413 square meters prior to J (hereinafter “J”) and four parcels.

C. The transfer of the registration to the network H and the Defendants’ inheritance 1) The network H among the lands owned by the network G on August 1, 1989, refers to the “instant land” in the name of the land of No. 1, K 479 square meters and J land (hereinafter the above three parcels of land).

On October 17, 1988, the deceased on March 29, 1991. (2) The deceased on March 29, 1991.

3) On May 29, 192, the Defendants completed each registration of ownership transfer based on inheritance with respect to the remaining land except for the land No. 1 among the instant land as part of May 29, 1992, with shares of Defendant E 3/5 and shares of Defendant F 2/5. 4) After the completion of each registration of ownership transfer based on inheritance. From the instant land, the land Nos. 2, 3 and 4 to 7 were divided from the land No. 479 square meters of the instant land, and from the land No. 1,629 square meters of the L prior to the

The death of the deceased G and the inheritance network G of the plaintiffs et al. died on March 2, 1996, and the plaintiffs, the defendants, and the network M inherited or inherited the property by inheritance.

[Reasons for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and 20 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)

(2) The grounds of appeal No. 1

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiffs are either unlawful or unlawful in the registration procedure under the name of the net H with respect to the instant land as follows.