1. The Defendants jointly set forth the Plaintiff KRW 4,00,00,000, Plaintiff B, and C respectively with respect to each of the said amounts.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Relevant Plaintiffs B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, and both Plaintiff A and Defendant D were the dynamics who were accompanying the same middle school, and Defendant F is the mother of Defendant D.

B. Around April 2014 or around May 2014, Defendant D’s pro-Japanese, and H had a sexual intercourse with Plaintiff A as the Plaintiff’s home. 2) On August 2014, Defendant D, G, H, I, and J again concluded a sexual intercourse with Defendant D except Plaintiff D, H, H, and J with the Plaintiff’s house.

3) Defendant D, who had a sexual intercourse with Plaintiff A, demanded the Plaintiff to send a bridge photograph to the Plaintiff, and upon the Plaintiff’s refusal, the Plaintiff threatened the Plaintiff A to know about his sexual intercourse with her mother on February 2015, and received the Plaintiff’s chest and reproductive organ from Plaintiff A, etc. around June 2015. (4) When Plaintiff B became aware of the sexual intercourse with Plaintiff A and Defendant D, Defendant D expressed that she would send his/her photograph to his/her friendship or worship unless he/she talks with the Plaintiff about why she would have a sexual intercourse with the Plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 5 (including branch numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Defendant D’s assertion 1: (a) committed an indecent act with H and G around August 2014; (b) committed rape with H, G, J, etc. around July 2014; and (c) made intimidation, such as: (a) not knowing the sex relationship to the parents or sending a photo by affixing the photo; and (b) intimidation that, around June 2015, Defendant D and Defendant D’s mother, who is a tort, were jointly and severally liable to supervise and educate Defendant D, as the mother of Defendant D and Defendant D, claimed the amount of money claimed for medical treatment to the Plaintiffs; (b) around August 1, 2014, and around July 8, 2014, Defendant F, who was under the duty to supervise and educate Defendant D, as the one of the parents of Defendant D and around June 2015, notified the parents of the fact of sex relationship; and (c) made a threat that he/she would have made the request for medical treatment expenses to the Plaintiffs.