logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.10.04 2018고정663
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle B in the amount of car driving, in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

On April 2, 2018, the Defendant was driving the said vehicle in a state where it is impossible to drive the vehicle normally, such as the distance between walking and walking, in a state that the alcohol concentration in the blood is divided into 0.144% and that is, in a state where it is impossible to drive the vehicle at a normal level, at the same time, from the direction of the high-speed high-speed high-speed high-speed high-speed road, the Defendant was driving the said vehicle directly above one-lane between the two-lane high-speed high-speed high-speed high-speed road.

In this case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering and steering gear of those engaged in driving service and accurately manipulating the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to take care of the victim C (52) who stops in the signal atmosphere due to negligence when he neglected to do so and neglected to do so, and was driven by the victim C (52) who was driven by the signal atmosphere, and received the part behind the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant stated the victim’s original bill of indictment for about four weeks by occupational negligence as “two weeks”. However, in light of the content of the medical certificate (Evidence List No. 9) to which the Defendant consented, it is apparent that the Defendant is a clerical error in the “four weeks”, and thus, ex officio correction was made.

The injury was inflicted on the salt, tension, etc. of the trend that requires treatment among them.

2. On the day specified in paragraph (1), the Defendant driven a bskn vehicle in the influence of alcohol 0.14% from the 2km section from the roads front of the trade infinite-dong Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong to the site of the accident described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver in charge;

arrow