beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. In full view of the overall purport of the statements and arguments by Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 3 as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff and the selected person shall recognize the fact that they were employed and worked for the defendant, who is the real representative of E located in Si Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do d from each date to each date indicated in the "period of Time" in the "date of Time" in the "date of Time" in the "date of Time" in the "date of Time" table of the claim amount in the attached
Therefore, barring any special circumstance, the Plaintiff and the Defendant are obligated to pay each of the money indicated in the “amount claimed” column in the attached Form No. 1 to the Plaintiff and the designated parties, and each of them, to pay 20% delay damages per annum as stipulated in the Labor Standards Act from the corresponding date to the date of full payment.
2. Judgment on the defendant's assertion
A. The plaintiff and the designated person of the defendant are employed by F, and the defendant did not employ the plaintiff and the designated person.
B. According to the evidence evidence Nos. 2 through 4, the plaintiff and the selected person filed a complaint with the Busan Regional Employment and Labor Administration of the Republic of Busan for the reason of the defendant's non-payment of wages, etc., G from July 2017 to the effect that "the plaintiff and the selected person worked as a managing director in E" was "the plaintiff and the selected person worked as a managing director in E" in the investigation process, F stated that the plaintiff and the selected person did not work in F, and F stated that the plaintiff and the designated person did not work in F, and the amount of the income certificate are entered in E, and the plaintiff and the selected person were paid wages from the representative H (the defendant's birth) in the name of E, and the defendant was indicted as the charge of violating the Labor Standards Act and issued a summary order (the Changwon District Court Decision 2019Da744).