logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.11.21 2018고정927
경범죄처벌법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be the day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 17, 2018, around 11:20, the Defendant: (a) sought a parking problem for 310 minutes in Gangseo-gu, Seoul, the Gangseo-gu Seoul, the police station, the Gangseo-gu, Seoul, for the reasons that the Defendant did not process a civil petition despite having been aware of the procedure for treatment; and (b) carried out a bath for “Creshing a son, a daily treatment sea” at the entrance of the said district on the ground that he did not handle a civil petition, and carried out a riotous or disorderly speech and behavior, and carried out alcohol from the district for which he was a government office to cancel the 20 minutes of the week.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. An explanatory note;

1. A written statement of the main officer;

1. Investigation report (for suspect A's revocation of the owner of the government office, motion picture analysis);

1. Results of the reproduction of CDs ( CCTV images at the location of the occurrence of the incident);

1. Application of statutes governing the case-related photographs

1. Relevant provisions of the Punishment Act concerning the facts constituting the crime, and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act concerning the selective punishment (the point of issue in the official document and the selection of fines);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order [The defendant and his defense counsel found the district of this case in order to solve the problem of illegal parking without permission and resist the situation where the civil petition was not treated, and the defendant's act did not interfere with the business of the district and did not constitute a justifiable act.

However, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., ① the Defendant interfered with the passage of the visitors before the opening of the open door of each of the instant district, and ② the police officer’s “bit of bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a police officer,” and the police officer’s desire not take place.

Whether or not a defect will not be expressed;

On the other hand, the police did not work while continuing to resolve the problem of parking in private land even though police officers under the jurisdiction of the Gu office have made several remarks.

It means a large sound.

arrow