logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.10.10 2015고정1218
상해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a 'F' located in shipping Daegu Ethm.

On May 4, 2015, around 14:40, in Busan Shipping Daegu G, the victim B's garden drainage pipe water flows into the defendant's garden, and the defendant laid the end of the drainage pipe toward the upper shore.

For this reason, the "domination of this lake" and "domination of this lake is n't n't n't n't n't n', and the defendant's n't kn't n't kn't n't n't n't n't n't n

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order

1. At around 14:40 on May 4, 2015, Defendant B, on the ground that Defendant B, in the garden located in Busan Metropolitan Transportation Daegu G, the water of the Defendant vegetable garden drainage pipe flows into the victim A’s garden, the victim came to the end of the drainage pipe to the upper end of the drainage pipe, Defendant B, on the ground that Defendant B, on the ground that Defendant B, on the ground that he was drinking, suffered an injury that requires treatment for a period of 20 days due to the salt and tension of the vegetable river (e.g., g., the vegetable river).

2. The Defendant alleged that there was no injury to the victim. As such, this Court has duly adopted the evidence and completed the investigation. In other words, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence, namely, ① the witness A states that the Defendant and her husband did febbb, or her husband took febbb, and that the Defendant suffered injury due to the Defendant’s febbb, feb, as the Defendant and her husband took feb, and the Defendant’s husband took feb, and the Defendant suffered injury. In light of the above, it is unclear whether the Defendant was feb, and whether the Defendant suffered injury due to the injury. ② The witness H

arrow