Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a bicycle for CCA100 engine devices, while the victim D(33) is a person who drives E K5 cars.

At around 19:40 on June 27, 2016, the Defendant was running a bicycle on the front of an elementary school along the two lanes in front of the front of the 19:40-ro Yancheon-gu, Yancheon-gu, 100:0, and the Defendant was driving the bicycle on the front of the elementary school along the two-lanes. The injured person was going to the left and obstructed the entry and course in the future of the Defendant, and the injured person was obstructed by entering the future, using a motor device, which is dangerous object, is tight back to the right side of the victim, and the injured person was faced with the vehicle by avoiding the Defendant and changing the lane into a two-lane, and the injured person was threatening by driving the two-lanes and two-lanes in the two-lanes for a section of about 600 meters.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each internal investigation report:

1. Application of any retaliation motion picture image statute;

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 2 and 60 (2) of the Juvenile Act, Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act, mitigation of juvenile offenses;

1. Although the crime in this case was committed without being aware of the reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, since the defendant committed the crime in this case without being aware of it during the period of suspension of execution, the defendant is still a juvenile, his status as a student, his/her agreement was reached smoothly with the victim, the disposition inside the society against the defendant was deemed more appropriate as a result of the investigation conducted prior to the judgment, and the juvenile protective disposition is considered as appropriate when considering the defendant's age, etc., it is difficult to readily conclude that it is appropriate in light of other defendant's age, sex, motive, means and consequence of the crime in this case, and the conditions of the punishment as ordered in the Disposition.