logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.07.18 2014고정1004
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a general restaurant in the name of “C” on the first floor and the first floor of the building underground in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun.

No person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall place a false indication of the place of origin or place a mark likely to cause confusion therewith.

Nevertheless, from October 6, 2012 to January 19, 2013, the Defendant purchased 186,000,837,000 won, respectively, in the “stock company E” located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, for the bones of Chile C. 20 km and the bones of Germany.

From December 2, 2012 to January 22, 2013, the Defendant, at the above general restaurant, stated “domination costs: Domestic acid” on the bulletin board of the business establishment, and cooked the said Chile and the bones of 108km overlapping with the bones of Germany for the use of swine, sold KRW 3,240,000, and stored 2 kilograms in the air conditioners in the business establishment for sale.

Accordingly, the Defendant made a false indication of origin for both faith.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement of detection;

1. Investigation report (a detailed statement attached to transactions and specify the quantity to be purchased for the violated items);

1. A criminal investigation report (attached to a specification of transactions, January 2013);

1. A report on investigation (calculated sales price);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing field evidence photographs;

1. Relevant Article on criminal facts and Articles 15 and 6 (2) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products (generally, choice of fines) concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow