A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On March 5, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Daejeon District Court, and was released on May 13, 2016 in the Daejeon Prison on parole on the execution of the sentence, and the parole period expired on July 22, 2016.

1. On September 24, 2017, the Defendant assaulted on the floor of the victim on one occasion on the ground that the victim E (28 years old) was her fright before the main point of “D” located in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu Daejeon on September 24, 2017, on the ground that the victim E (28 years old) was her fright.

2. On the front of the G parking lot located near Daejeon, Daejeon, about 02:00 on the same day, the Defendant was dispatched to the police station of the Daejeon, who was reported as the day when the Defendant continued to escape from the war as described in the preceding paragraph, such as the noise to the surrounding people and was faced with the steel scrap blockingr in the said place, and was in order to stop the Defendant’s act, and was dispatched to the police station of the Daejeon, Daejeon, Police Station I (51) (51) who controlled the Defendant’s act.

The 'this son' has expressed the desire to do so, and the hand floor has taken one time the left side of the son.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of official duties concerning I's 112 reported business affairs.

3. The Defendant, who damaged public goods, was arrested at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph as an flagrant offender at the time and place, was killed in the JJJ patrol vehicle, and moved to the front seat of the vehicle in the vehicle that runs along the H district of the police station in the Daejeon Central Police Agency, and walked over three to four occasions, etc., the lower part of the vehicle, which led to the destruction of the repair cost equivalent to KRW 150,000,000, to the above vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the articles used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Entry of the E-document;

1. Statement made to I in the police statement protocol;

1. A statement of a report on investigation;

1. Application of each Act or subordinate statute of the reporting of the particulars of acceptance by each individual and the facts of previous convictions and results thereof;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties).