logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.27 2017가단5228994
추심금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 8,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from December 14, 2017 to August 27, 2018.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 17, 2017, the Defendant agreed to make monthly payments for the construction work of reinforced concrete (hereinafter “instant construction”) among the new construction works for the 110th anniversary of the establishment of the Youngdong Association (hereinafter “Songdong Construction”) with the contract price of KRW 1,523,50,000 (including value-added tax) and the construction period from February 17, 2017 to September 30, 2017.

B. Upon entering into an agreement on July 31, 2017 with the instant construction contract, the Defendant settled the construction cost based on the completed value of the instant construction project at KRW 1,341,850,00 (including value-added tax). The details of the construction cost that the Defendant paid to the sewage suppliers of Sungju Construction or Sungju Construction before the termination of the said construction contract are as shown in the attached Table.

C. On June 26, 2017, the Plaintiff received a decision of provisional seizure of claim against KRW 100,870,814 of the instant construction payment claim against the Defendant, which was rendered by Cheongju District Court 2017Kadan50691, and the original copy of the said decision was served on the Defendant on June 29, 201.

The Plaintiff filed an application for a collection order of the claim and the provisional seizure of KRW 100,870,814 from the instant provisional seizure order to the original seizure based on the original copy of the executory order of payment with Cheongcheon-gun District Court 2017 tea34 other (money) (hereinafter “instant provisional seizure order”). On August 21, 2017, the above court issued a collection order of the claim and the collection order of KRW 2,393,885 to the effect that “The Plaintiff may collect the above provisional seizure, and the original copy of the above seizure and collection order was served on the Defendant on August 24, 2017.”

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 shall include a number.

arrow