The prosecution of this case against the Defendants is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the (State) C representative director.

Defendant

B is the C Executive Director.

Defendant

A around 13:00 on May 22, 2013, when the victim E (the age of 32) was dismissed from the office of the Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government DD Building 802 (the age of 802) office and returned to the office did not harm the victim's fingerprint awareness in entering the office, and the defendant B, who was next, made the victim's 'interest consciousness and brus' statement to the victim in order to avoid this, and insulting the victim's patently insulting the victim by openly referring to the victim's 's illness and brus' statement to the victim.

2. The instant facts charged against the Defendants are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon the victim’s complaint under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim E withdraws the complaint against the Defendants on November 11, 2013, after the instant prosecution was instituted, the instant indictment against the Defendants is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.