logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.11.20 2014고단3053
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 3053] The Defendant operated a plant producing clothes with the trade name “D” in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, by April 1995, and operated a chip store of women, “F” in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. On April 18, 1995, the Defendant left the United States and entered the Republic of Korea on September 30, 2014.

The Defendant used bonds worth KRW 40,000,000 due to continuous management difficulties at the time of operating a factory and clothing store as above, but failed to pay rent for the factory and clothing store, and thus, was fully used as rent for the factory and clothing store, and was faced with serious financial difficulties, such as before the beginning of the factory.

1. When the Defendant had experienced serious financial difficulties as above, he thought that he had forged a lease contract to use money as collateral for the security of rental deposit.

On August 194, the Defendant: (a) indicated that the lessor G leases approximately KRW 65,00,000 for monthly rent deposit, KRW 30,000,000 for monthly rent, and KRW 1,60,000,000 for monthly rent in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu; and (b) indicated that the lessor G rents approximately KRW 65,00,000 for monthly rent in the monthly rent contract form, and (c) marked G painting, which was rejected in advance, in the name of the lessor

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a monthly rent contract in the name of G, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On August 29, 1994, the Defendant, at the I Office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H around August 29, 1994, exercised the forged store rent contract as if it were a document duly formed.

3. Fraud;

A. The criminal defendant against the victim J did not have any intent or ability to pay the money, even if he/she borrowed money from others due to such economic circumstances as above.

Nevertheless, on August 29, 194, the defendant's goods in the store because the defendant's 's lavement from the above I to the victim J' has been changed.

arrow